He has " "as a waiter in a restaurant.填served还是to serve

\u6c42To serve,or to be served\u6709\u5173\u7684\u6f14\u8bb2\u7a3f

\u3000\u3000\u770b\u770b\u8fd9\u4e2a\u600e\u4e48\u6837!The other day I was talking to someone from northern China on MSN, who is now in England. She mentioned that she didn't like people criticise the central government as it didn't look good. But since when this has become a matter of looking good?!?! It never was, never is and never should be. It should always be whether the authority is really doing good things for the people, to be the government 'of the people, for the people, by the people'! She said even though the central government was not so good, but people should not criticise it too much, otherwise it would be a bit difficult to control.... But why should it be easy for the government to control?! A goverment is there to serve, not control the people. Otherwise why should its employees be called 'public servants'?!! Even in Chinese proverbes there are sayings meaning something like 'let a thousand flowers bloom' etc. If other dissident voices are not allowed and different views not permitted to air, how can things be improved, within a small circle of cronies and the 'like-minded'?! All the more poignant is that she is now in the isles where she has no worry of persecution. Such brilliant consequence of brain-wash-like education (or infatuation for material wealth possession and accumulation), which is in fact disguised coercion, can really get one's blood boiling.

\u3000\u3000This year I set my exam questions in such a way that it would allow some students to have a bit of mental gynamsium. During marking I found this astute observation from one student who had spent some time in China:

\u3000\u3000"In the UK there is considerable freedom, whereas in more communist countries such as China, having spent
\u3000\u3000considerable time there personally, people feel a duty to serve the state and this psychology is taken into
\u3000\u3000their working environment."

\u3000\u3000The student also talked about the recent scandals in the government (the Home Office, John Prescott etc.) and said:

\u3000\u3000".... hope it will go un-noticed. This is where the media in our society has a role to play in making
\u3000\u3000organisations accountable."

\u3000\u3000How incisive! Bravo!!!

The other day I was talking to someone from northern China on MSN, who is now in England. She mentioned that she didn't like people criticise the central government as it didn't look good. But since when this has become a matter of looking good?!?! It never was, never is and never should be. It should always be whether the authority is really doing good things for the people, to be the government 'of the people, for the people, by the people'! She said even though the central government was not so good, but people should not criticise it too much, otherwise it would be a bit difficult to control.... But why should it be easy for the government to control?! A goverment is there to serve, not control the people. Otherwise why should its employees be called 'public servants'?!! Even in Chinese proverbes there are sayings meaning something like 'let a thousand flowers bloom' etc. If other dissident voices are not allowed and different views not permitted to air, how can things be improved, within a small circle of cronies and the 'like-minded'?! All the more poignant is that she is now in the isles where she has no worry of persecution. Such brilliant consequence of brain-wash-like education (or infatuation for material wealth possession and accumulation), which is in fact disguised coercion, can really get one's blood boiling.

This year I set my exam questions in such a way that it would allow some students to have a bit of mental gynamsium. During marking I found this astute observation from one student who had spent some time in China:

"In the UK there is considerable freedom, whereas in more communist countries such as China, having spent
considerable time there personally, people feel a duty to serve the state and this psychology is taken into
their working environment."

The student also talked about the recent scandals in the government (the Home Office, John Prescott etc.) and said:

".... hope it will go un-noticed. This is where the media in our society has a role to play in making
organisations accountable."

How incisive! Bravo!!!

我觉得两个都可以，只是意思不一样he has to serve as 表示他不得不做，可能需要钱，他不得不做服务员he has served as表示做服务员已经一段时间了

served has助动词，served谓语动词如果用to serve，has to 成了助动词，意思上就有区别了。

to serve 此句不是完成时态 而是 have to do sth

served

扩展阅读：www.sony.com.cn ... mouse sensitivity ... mac蜜桃奶茶314 ... quid pro quo hpss ... www.vivo.com ... quote as saying ... &quot 12123&quot ... shape of my heart ... stubborn ...