微观经济学英文小论文 求一篇~~中英对照~~的~~微观经济学~~论文，最好是得过诺...
\u6c42\u4e00\u7bc7\u5fae\u89c2\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u82f1\u6587\u8bba\u6587\uff0c1200\u5b57\u5de6\u53f3\uff0c\u683c\u5f0f\u8981\u9f50\u5168\uff0c\u9644\u5e26\u8bc4\u8bba\u6587\u7ae0\u90fd\u628a\u767e\u5ea6\u5f53\u4e0a\u5e1d\u4e86\u3002
\u8fd850\u5206\uff0c\u5373\u4fbf\u7ed950\u4eba\u6c11\u5e01\u51991200\u5b57\u82f1\u6587\u4e13\u4e1a\u8bba\u6587\uff0c\u4e5f\u591f\u5c0f\u6c14\u4e86\u3002
\u81ea\u5df1\u53bbcnki\u641c
http://books.google.com.sg/books?hl=en&id=zEWLzTG8AaoC&dq=microeconomics&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=jrDI7PRZxe&sig=SgJN266URG0LouI5cnNJY0NLlKs&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=resultMicroeconomics is a branch of economics that studies how individuals, households and firms make decisions to allocate limited resources,[1] typically in markets where goods or services are being bought and sold.
Microeconomics examines how these decisions and behaviours affect the supply and demand for goods and services, which determines prices; and how prices, in turn, determine the supply and demand of goods and services.[2][3]
Macroeconomics, on the other hand, involves the "sum total of economic activity, dealing with the issues of growth, inflation and unemployment, and with national economic policies relating to these issues"[2] and the effects of government actions (such as changing taxation levels) on them.[4] Particularly in the wake of the Lucas critique, much of modern macroeconomic theory has been built upon 'microfoundations' — i.e. based upon basic assumptions about micro-level behaviour.
One of the goals of microeconomics is to analyze market mechanisms that establish relative prices amongst goods and services and allocation of limited resources amongst many alternative uses. Microeconomics analyzes market failure, where markets fail to produce efficient results, as well as describing the theoretical conditions needed for perfect competition. Significant fields of study in microeconomics include general equilibrium, markets under asymmetric information, choice under uncertainty and economic applications of game theory. Also considered is the elasticity of products within the market system.
Assumptions and definitions
The theory of supply and demand usually assumes that markets are perfectly competitive. This implies that there are many buyers and sellers in the market and none of them have the capacity to significantly influence prices of goods and services. In many real-life transactions, the assumption fails because some individual buyers or sellers or groups of buyers or sellers do have the ability to influence prices. Quite often a sophisticated analysis is required to understand the demand-supply equation of a good. However, the theory works well in simple situations.
Mainstream economics does not assume a priori that markets are preferable to other forms of social organization. In fact, much analysis is devoted to cases where so-called market failures lead to resource allocation that is suboptimal by some standard (highways are the classic example, profitable to all for use but not directly profitable for anyone to finance). In such cases, economists may attempt to find policies that will avoid waste directly by government control, indirectly by regulation that induces market participants to act in a manner consistent with optimal welfare, or by creating "missing markets" to enable efficient trading where none had previously existed. This is studied in the field of collective action. It also must be noted that "optimal welfare" usually takes on a Paretian norm, which in its mathematical application of Kaldor-Hicks Method, does not stay consistent with the Utilitarian norm within the normative side of economics which studies collective action, namely public choice. Market failure in positive economics (microeconomics) is limited in implications without mixing the belief of the economist and his or her theory.
The demand for various commodities by individuals is generally thought of as the outcome of a utility-maximizing process. The interpretation of this relationship between price and quantity demanded of a given good is that, given all the other goods and constraints, this set of choices is that one which makes the consumer happiest.
[edit] Modes of operation
It is assumed that all firms are following rational decision-making, and will produce at the profit-maximizing output. Given this assumption, there are four categories in which a firm's profit may be considered.
A firm is said to be making an economic profit when its average total cost is less than the price of each additional product at the profit-maximizing output. The economic profit is equal to the quantity output multiplied by the difference between the average total cost and the price.
A firm is said to be making a normal profit when its economic profit equals zero. This occurs where average total cost equals price at the profit-maximizing output.
If the price is between average total cost and average variable cost at the profit-maximizing output, then the firm is said to be in a loss-minimizing condition. The firm should still continue to produce, however, since its loss would be larger if it were to stop producing. By continuing production, the firm can offset its variable cost and at least part of its fixed cost, but by stopping completely it would lose the entirety of its fixed cost.
If the price is below average variable cost at the profit-maximizing output, the firm should go into shutdown. Losses are minimized by not producing at all, since any production would not generate returns significant enough to offset any fixed cost and part of the variable cost. By not producing, the firm loses only its fixed cost. By losing this fixed cost the company faces a challenge. It must either exit the market or remain in the market and risk a complete loss.
[edit] Market failure
Main article: Market failure
In microeconomics, the term "market failure" does not mean that a given market has ceased functioning. Instead, a market failure is a situation in which a given market does not efficiently organize production or allocate goods and services to consumers. Economists normally apply the term to situations where the inefficiency is particularly dramatic, or when it is suggested that non-market institutions would provide a more desirable result. On the other hand, in a political context, stakeholders may use the term market failure to refer to situations where market forces do not serve the public interest.
The four main types or causes of market failure are:
Monopolies or other cases of abuse of market power where a "single buyer or seller can exert significant influence over prices or output". Abuse of market power can be reduced by using antitrust regulations.[5]
Externalities, which occur in cases where the "market does not take into account the impact of an economic activity on outsiders." There are positive externalities and negative externalities.[5] Positive externalities occur in cases such as when a television program on family health improves the public's health. Negative externalities occur in cases such as when a company’s processes pollutes air or waterways. Negative externalities can be reduced by using government regulations, taxes, or subsidies, or by using property rights to force companies and individuals to take the impacts of their economic activity into account.
Public goods are goods that have the characteristics that they are non-excludable and non-rivalous and include national defense[5] and public health initiatives such as draining mosquito-breeding marshes. For example, if draining mosquito-breeding marshes was left to the private market, far fewer marshes would probably be drained. To provide a good supply of public goods, nations typically use taxes that compel all residents to pay for these public goods (due to scarce knowledge of the positive externalities to third parties/social welfare); and
Cases where there is asymmetric information or uncertainty (information inefficiency).[5] Information asymmetry occurs when one party to a transaction has more or better information than the other party. For example, used-car salespeople may know whether a used car has been used as a delivery vehicle or taxi, information that may not be available to buyers. Typically it is the seller that knows more about the product than the buyer, but this is not always the case. An example of a situation where the buyer may have better information than the seller would be an estate sale of a house, as required by a last will and testament. A real estate broker purchasing this house may have more information about the house than the family members of the deceased.
This situation was first described by Kenneth J. Arrow in a seminal article on health care in 1963 entitled "Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care," in the American Economic Review. George Akerlof later used the term asymmetric information in his 1970 work The Market for Lemons. Akerlof noticed that, in such a market, the average value of the commodity tends to go down, even for those of perfectly good quality, because the buyer has no way of knowing whether the product they are buying will turn out to be a "lemon" (a defective product).
[edit] Opportunity cost
Main article: Opportunity cost
Although opportunity cost can be hard to quantify, the effect of opportunity cost is universal and very real on the individual level. In fact, this principle applies to all decisions, not just economic ones. Since the work of the Austrian economist Friedrich von Wieser, opportunity cost has been seen as the foundation of the marginal theory of value.
Opportunity cost is one way to measure the cost of something. Rather than merely identifying and adding the costs of a project, one may also identify the next best alternative way to spend the same amount of money. The forgone profit of this next best alternative is the opportunity cost of the original choice. A common example is a farmer that chooses to farm his land rather than rent it to neighbors, wherein the opportunity cost is the forgone profit from renting. In this case, the farmer may expect to generate more profit himself. Similarly, the opportunity cost of attending university is the lost wages a student could have earned in the workforce, rather than the cost of tuition, books, and other requisite items (whose sum makes up the total cost of attendance). The opportunity cost of a vacation in the Bahamas might be the down payment money for a house.
Note that opportunity cost is not the sum of the available alternatives, but rather the benefit of the single, best alternative. Possible opportunity costs of the city's decision to build the hospital on its vacant land are the loss of the land for a sporting center, or the inability to use the land for a parking lot, or the money that could have been made from selling the land, or the loss of any of the various other possible uses—but not all of these in aggregate. The true opportunity cost would be the forgone profit of the most lucrative of those listed.
One question that arises here is how to assess the benefit of dissimilar alternatives. We must determine a dollar value associated with each alternative to facilitate comparison and assess opportunity cost, which may be more or less difficult depending on the things we are trying to compare. For example, many decisions involve environmental impacts whose dollar value is difficult to assess because of scientific uncertainty. Valuing a human life or the economic impact of an Arctic oil spill involves making subjective choices with ethical implications.
绛旓細(娉:J.鍗″竷灏,鈥滃璁轰笌姒傝:浜т笟缁忔祹瀛︾殑鍙戝睍杩戝喌鈥,杞絁.鍗″竷灏斾富缂,銆婁骇涓氱粡娴庡鍓嶆部闂銆,绗2椤,鑻辨枃鐗堣Cable,John(ed.),1994,Current Issues in Industrial Economics,New York,Macmillan.)瑗挎柟浜т笟缁勭粐鐞嗚缁忚繃鍑犲崄骞寸殑鍙戝睍,宸叉垚涓虹爺绌跺璞℃槑纭佸唴瀹逛赴瀵屻佷綋绯诲畬鏁淬佸簲鐢ㄦу己鐨勭浉瀵圭嫭绔嬬殑寰缁忔祹瀛绉戙
绛旓細鈥滀负浠涔堣埅绌哄叕鍙告効鎰忎互寰堜綆鐨勭エ浠峰嚭鍞満绁ㄢ?鍋囪涓鏋舵湁200涓骇浣嶇殑椋炴満璺ㄥ浗椋炶涓娆★紝鑸┖鍏徃鐨勬垚鏈槸100涓嘡MB锛屽湪杩欑鎯呭喌涓嬶紝姣忎釜搴т綅鐨勫钩鍧囨垚鏈槸5000RMB锛屼汉浠氨璁や负绁ㄤ环涓嶅簲璇ヤ綆浜5000RMB銆備絾瀹為檯涓婏紝鍋囪杩欐灦椋炴満璧烽鏃朵粛鏈20涓┖浣嶃傝繖鏃跺亣璁炬湁涔樺鎯充互3000RMB涔颁竴寮犵エ锛岄偅涔堣埅绌哄叕鍙镐竴瀹氭効鎰忕殑锛...
绛旓細The property securitization takes the lead in on century 70's by US to promote, passes through the half century development, the property securitization in the developed country already suitable popularization. From American, Japanese and the European developed country property securitization ...
绛旓細[鏈枃鎽樿]鏈枃璇曞浘涓轰腑鍥界Щ鍔ㄥ湪澶у鏍″洯鐨勬垚鍔熸帹骞夸粠寰缁忔祹瀛瑙掑害鎻愪緵涓绉嶈В閲,鐢辨鎺ㄥ嚭鍏锋湁涓瀹氬競鍦哄娍鍔涚殑浼佷笟閲囧彇甯傚満鎴樼暐鏃舵墍闇鑰冭檻鐨勫悇绉嶈嚜韬拰绔炰簤鑰呭洜绱,骞剁敱姝ゅ绉诲姩缁х画淇濇寔棰嗗厛鍦颁綅鍙婁綔涓哄競鍦烘寫鎴樿呯殑鑱旈氬湪澶у鏍″洯甯傚満鐨勬帹骞挎彁鍑鸿嚜宸辩殑寤鸿銆 涓 闂鐨勬彁鍑 鐜板湪,鎴戜滑鐨勫ぇ瀛︽牎鍥噷,鎵嬫満宸茬粡鐩稿綋鐨勬櫘鍙娿傚洜姝...
绛旓細浠ヤ笅鏄垜鏁寸悊鐨寰缁忔祹瀛涓庡畯瑙傜粡娴庡涔嬮棿鐨勫尯鍒強鑱旂郴璁烘枃,浠呬緵鍙傝,娆㈣繋澶у闃呰銆 鎽樿: 閲嶅晢涓讳箟銆佸彜鍏哥粡娴庡銆佹柊鍙ゅ吀缁忔祹瀛︿互鍙婄幇浠ｅ畯瑙傜粡娴庡鏄タ鏂圭粡娴庡浜х敓鍒掑垎鐨勫洓涓樁娈,鍙湁纭畾浜嗘椤瑰唴瀹规墠鑳藉寰缁忔祹瀛︿笌瀹忚缁忔祹瀛︿箣闂寸殑鍖哄埆涓庤仈绯昏繘琛岃繘涓姝ョ殑鎺㈢┒涓庡垎鏋愩傛湰鏂囩畝杩颁簡寰缁忔祹瀛︿笌瀹忚缁忔祹瀛︾殑褰㈡垚...
绛旓細浠ヤ笅鏄垜甯ぇ瀹舵暣鐞嗙殑寰缁忔祹瀛﹁鏂,浠呬緵鍙傝,澶у涓璧锋潵鐪嬬湅鍚с 寰缁忔祹瀛﹁鏂 绡1 鎽樿 :涓轰簡甯姪瀛︾敓绉疮浼佷笟绠＄悊鐨勭粡楠屽拰淇冩垚寰缁忔祹瀛︽暀瀛︽柟寮忕殑鏀硅繘,鏂囩珷鏍规嵁椹厠鎬濈悊鎬ц璇嗕緷璧栦簬鎰熸ц璇嗙殑鍩烘湰鍘熺悊,瀵逛紒涓氭矙鐩樻ā鎷熷湪寰缁忔祹瀛︽暀瀛︿腑鐨勫簲鐢ㄨ繘琛屼簡鎺㈢┒銆 鍏抽敭璇 :寰缁忔祹瀛;鐢熶骇鑰呰涓虹悊璁;浼佷笟 娌欑洏妯℃嫙...
绛旓細浜岄樁鍋忓鏁板皬浜庨浂涔熷氨鏄敓浜у嚱鏁扮殑鍑告у亣璁,琛ㄦ槑涓绉嶇敓浜ц绱犵殑杈归檯浜у搧浼氶殢璇ヨ绱犵殑鎶曞叆閲忓鍔犺岄掑噺鐨,杩欐槸涓涓瘮涓闃跺鏁板ぇ浜庨浂杈冨己鐨勫亣瀹,杩欏氨鏄粡娴庡涓父甯镐娇鐢ㄧ殑杈归檯浜у搧閫掑噺瑙勫緥銆傗滃疄闄呬笂杩欏苟涓嶆槸涓涓寰,鑰屾槸澶у鏁扮敓浜ц繃绋嬫墍鍏锋湁鐨勫叡鍚岀壒鎬р濄(娉:鑼冮噷瀹:銆寰缁忔祹瀛:鐜颁唬瑙傜偣銆,涓婃捣涓夎仈鍑虹増绀俱...
绛旓細瑗挎柟寰缁忔祹瀛鐨勫緲寰婁笌鍙戝睍 鍩轰簬寰缁忔祹瀛︽柟娉曠殑缃戠粶璧勬簮鍒嗛厤鐮旂┒ 鍊鹃攢涓庡弽鍊鹃攢鐨勫井瑙傜粡娴庡鍒嗘瀽 寰缁忔祹瀛︾悊璁虹殑鍓嶆部闂 璇曡闈炲潎琛＄悊璁虹殑寰缁忔祹瀛﹀熀纭 Power Pool涓彂鐢靛叕鍙哥珵浠烽棶棰樼殑寰缁忔祹瀛﹀垎鏋 绾靛悜鍏煎苟鐨勫井瑙傜粡娴庡鍩虹 鐜颁唬寰缁忔祹瀛︾殑鏂板彂灞曚笌涓浗缁忔祹浣撳埗鏀归潻 閲戣瀺鍒涙柊鐨勫井瑙傜粡娴庡鐞嗚涓...
绛旓細涓轰粬鐨勫鏈爺绌跺瀹氫簡鍧氬疄鐨勫熀纭銆傚湪鐮旂┒棰嗗煙锛屽嚡鏂暀鎺堜笓娉ㄤ簬鎴垮湴浜с佷綇鎴块棶棰樹互鍙婂叕鍏辫储鏀裤備粬鐨勫鏈垚鏋滀赴纭曪紝宸插嚭鐗堝寘鎷缁忔祹瀛鍘熺悊銆嬨併婄粡娴庡涓庣◣鏀舵斂绛栥嬩互鍙娿婅储浜х◣锛氭敼闈╃殑闇瑕併嬪湪鍐呯殑浜旀湰涔︼紝骞跺湪涓撲笟鏈熷垔涓婂彂琛ㄤ簡浼楀璁烘枃锛屽缁忔祹瀛︾悊璁虹殑鍙戝睍鍋氬嚭浜嗛噸瑕佽础鐚
绛旓細鍘熷寳浜ぇ瀛︿腑鍥界粡娴庣爺绌朵腑蹇冩暀鎺堟灄姣呭か鑰佸笀鏇剧粡璇磋繃锛氳鎯虫垚涓缁忔祹瀛瀹讹紝鍏跺疄鏄彲浠モ滈熸垚鈥濈殑锛屽彧瑕佽寰椾袱涓悊璁猴細涓涓槸鐩稿浠锋牸锛屾瘮濡傝鏃ユ湰鐨勬埧瀛愰兘寰堝皬锛岃岀數瑙嗘満灏辨瘮杈冨ぇ锛涜岀編鍥芥埧瀛愰兘寰堝ぇ锛岃岀數瑙嗘満灏辨瘮杈冨皬銆傚師鍥犳槸鍥犱负鏃ユ湰鐨勫湴浠风浉瀵圭編鍥芥潵璇村氨璐碉紝鐢佃鏈虹浉瀵规潵璇村垯寰堜究瀹溿傝繖灏辨槸鐩稿浠锋牸銆傝繕...
