求勇敢的心观后感一篇，英文的，300字左右 求《勇敢的心》英文观后感
\u6c42\u52c7\u6562\u7684\u5fc3\u82f1\u6587\u89c2\u540e\u611f300\u5b57\uff01\uff01\u8c22\u8c22\uff01\u52c7\u6562\u7684\u5fc3\u82f1\u6587\u89c2\u540e\u611f300\u5b57\uff0c\u89c1\u9644\u4ef6\u3002
Fighting? What's fighting?!What for? Every man in the world may go to fight,for peace,for freedom,or just for rage. These days I watched some excellent movies which received many awards in their times. Yesterday,I just finished watching Brave Heart.The excellent movie did gain tremendous achievements in those days .For instance,it was awarded Best Cinematography,Best Director,Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing,Best Makeup,Best Picture in Oscar (\u5965\u65af\u5361\u6700\u4f73\u5f71\u7247\u3001\u6700\u4f73\u5bfc\u6f14\u3001\u6700\u4f73\u6444\u5f71\u3001\u6700\u4f73\u97f3\u4e50\u3001\u6700\u4f73\u5316\u88c5\u4e94\u9879\u5927\u5956) and so on. The acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant.Everything that happens in this movie is unpredicted,such as Murron's death,William's participation in the battle,the reneging of Robert which caused by his father actually,and so on. The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable.I do respect for those heroes's courage very much.However, I was shocked by their unjustice death.They did not deserve so miserable a way of dying!! I hate Robert's father.The old man is really rascal! He broke his son's promise to William not only once,and it's he who brought William to death! Fortunately,the young leader,Robert the Bruce,was able to lead the fight for the scots freedom at last.Thanks for his bravery and justice. In addition,I respect the courage of other captains as well,such as Hamish.They fight for their sire,their grate William Wallace,the macaulish! Furthermore,when Iooked deep into their eyes, it remind me of the fight between Naruto and carra.I was surprised to find the same meaning in the eyes of these brave fighters! I admire them! I am so aflame in my heart after watching the movie that I hardly calm down,let alone to go to sleep... Brave Heart,as valiant as heroes! I will treasure the precious movies up.
1Wags enjoy razzing the 13th-century Scottish epic Braveheart, starring Mel Gibson in the role of freedom fighter William Wallace, as Die Hard in a kilt. Wait till they get to the knobby question of how Gibson's knees stack up against Liam Neeson's in Rob Roy. No matter. Gibson gets the last laugh. Braveheart resists glib categorization. This rousing, romantic adventure is laced with sorrow and savagery. The audacity Gibson shows as the film's director extends to the running time, which is nearly three hours. Hamlet, with Gibson playing the melancholy Dane, was shorter, and Braveheart isn't Shakespeare. Don't panic. Though the film dawdles a bit with the shimmery, dappled love stuff involving Wallace with a Scottish peasant and a French princess, the action will pin you to your seat. With breathtaking skill, Gibson captures the exhilaration and horror of combat in some of the most vivid battle scenes ever filmed.
Wallace was knighted for leading his people in the fight against domination by England. Few facts are known about his personal life, which frees Gibson and screenwriter Randall Wallace (no relation) to run with the legend passed down mostly from the rhyming verse of a poet known as Blind Harry. It's a shame that Harry predates Hollywood by five centuries -- he could have made a killing cranking out kick-ass crowd pleasers.
Gibson's Wallace is a potent blend of Robin Hood, Attila the Hun and, yes, the wags were right, Detective John McClane in Die Hard. Wallace could relate to any story that pits one pissed-off fighter against the system. He faced an English army led by bad-to-the-bone King Edward the Longshanks, played by Patrick McGooban in a classic portrait of slithering sadism. Wallace also had to inspire Scottish peasants and nobles to follow his lead against daunting odds.
It's a ripping yarn, and Gibson could have slid by with the usual hack heroics. Kevin Costner's Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves did just that and still earned a pile. Gibson does it the hard way with attention to detail. He has retained the keen eye for character he showed in The Man Without a Face, his promising 1993 directing debut. Wallace doesn't spring to life as a full-blown legend, though he does speak Latin and French when he returns to his village in Scotland to settle down as a farmer and marry Murron (the meltingly lovely Catherine McCormack), his childhood sweetheart. It's the brutal fate dished out to Murron by the English that makes the farmer an outlaw.
That's when Wallace organizes the villagers into a ragtag militia. Brendon Gleeson's Hamish, James Cosmo's Campbell and Alun Armstrong's Mornay register strongly, as does David O'Hara's Stephen, the Irish warrior who joins the Scottish cause. The teasing camaraderie botched in Robin Hood is expertly handled here. Gibson's impassioned performance as the hero who would not trade his freedom for English gold doesn't shrink from showing the barbarian who emerges at a call to arms.
"Are you ready for war?" Wallace shouts to his outnumbered troops at Stirling. It's the film's first major battle scene and a triumph for Gibson. Trying to stir hundreds of fatigued soldiers to action, Wallace rides his horse back and forth in a frantic effort to be heard. In most historical films, the stationary star manages to move multitudes with a throaty whisper. Gibson jettisons the Hollywood fakery. Riding among the men, his face streaked with woad (a blue dye used to terrify the enemy) and his voice hoarse from yelling. Wallace is a demon warrior crying out for vengeance.
Cinematographer John Toll, an Oscar winner for Legends of the Fall, thrusts the audience into the brutal frays at Stirling, York and Falkirk. Superbly edited by Steven Rosenblum (Glory), these sequences recall the blood poetry of Welles' Chimes at Midnight and Kurosawa's Seven Samurai. Sophisticated weaponry was centuries away. The Scots used hammers, axes, picks, swords, chains and even farm tools to crack skulls as they battered the English in the mud. They also set oil traps on the ground to burn their enemies, though shields and chain mail offered scant protection against the rain of English arrows. "Quite the lovely gathering." says Longshanks, surveying the carnage and dispatching his officers to send in Irish volunteers instead of expert English archers. "Arrows cost money," he sneers.
Gibson's handling of Wallace at war is so thrillingly done that one regrets the subplots that distract from the action. Wallace's flirtation with the king's French daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau), is fanciful fluff that undercuts his undying love for Murron, and the king's homophobic revenge on his preening son, Prince Edward (Peter Hanly), and the son's boy toy, Phillip (Stephen Billington), comes off as inexplicable gay baiting. Judicious cutting might have sharpened the film's focus and impact.
Still, don't get your kilt in a bunch over a spectacle that provokes such lively debate about the method and madness of war. Filmed with furious energy and surprising gravity, Braveheart takes the measure of a hero with a taste for blood to match his taste for honor. Wallace is an inspiring, unsettling role, and Gibson plays him, aptly, like a gathering storm.
2
Braveheart is an action/drama movie about William Wallace (Mel Gibson). The film is no less than amazing in any way. Though the movie sports us with a 177 minute run time, it is amazing to see the interesting way in which, Mel Gibson behind the camera, works his magic. As the acting is magnificent, and the war sequences are brutal and violent, the film works out as a movie which will always be remembered as a classic.
The film focuses on William Wallace, growing up as a kid, his father was a fighter. After his death, his uncle took him in to watch over him, and teach him how to fight. When he is older though, he meets Murron MacClannough(Catherine McCormack). After he weds with her, she is murdered. Now avenging her death, William sets out ot fight for his freedom, his justice and the right to live.
Mel Gibson did really an amazing job on capturing the character of William Wallace. Putting on the Irish accent, he shows us that he is a great actor and can do some things which we never thought he could do. Behind the camrea though, Mel is a completely different kind of person. He captures the fight scenes perfectly and beautifully. The one thing that was done well though, was the greatly realistic violence and brutal warfare of the film. The violence is spilled nicely, and realistically.
3
Braveheart is another film directed by its star, Mel Gibson. Close on the heels of Rob Roy, this is the second tribute to a legendary Scottish hero, this time round William Wallace, the great medieval warrior leader. Though less clever than its predecessor, it is much grander in its nearly three-hour epic sweep.
The obvious comparison is with Henry V (the Olivier, not the Branagh), and even though Randall Wallace may not be quite so good a screenwriter as Shakespeare, the movie can hold its own. Randall Wallace calls himself the spiritual descendant of William Wallace, and he has deftly incorporated the not many known facts about his namesake, and addressed the legend with gusto and eloquence. The result is an epic that, a few excessively romantic touches notwithstanding, is more realistic than most. These medieval Scots live in ferocious-looking hovels, seem (at least the men) heroically unwashed, and have coiffures in which a kestrel could nest. The friendly punches with which they communicate could easily kill a lesser fellow -- an Englishman, say. Braveheart aims to be a thinking man's epic. ``It's our wits that make us men,'' young William's da tells him, and, after da and big brother are killed by the English, Uncle Argyll continues the boy's education along similar lines. Pretty soon William has turned into Mel Gibson, a young man who wants to settle down and live in peace. But the English are making things hard, what with such things as ius primae noctis (in the film, more tersely but less correctly, the prima nocte) giving the English magistrate the right to deflower each lassie on her wedding night. Braveheartrending business, that. Finally William secretly marries the bonniest of lasses, Murron -- played by the breathtakingly beautiful and talented Catherine McCormack -- but the English get wind of it, and when she won't put out for them, slit her throat in a shattering scene irradiated by Miss McCormack's performance. So William turns avenger and, by one small further step, leader of the Scottish populace (as opposed to the nobles, suborned by Edward Longshanks, the Machiavellian English king). There are plots and counterplots as the nobles sabotage William's efforts, and Robert the Bruce, who wants to help him, is prevented by his leprous father (well played by Ian Bannen), who expects the nobles to crown his son king. And much, much more. The love scenes are so-so, the political scenes ho-hum, but the fighting -- both individual contests and mass battle scenes -- is first-rate, barbaric, and sublime. You might think that so much battle stuff would pall after a while: how much slashing, chopping, stabbing, and skewering -- not to mention mangling and incinerating -- can there be without diminishing returns? Quite a bit; Gibson, to give him his due, comes up with new forms of warfare, better ways to turn charging men and horses into shishkebabs, new modes of battering down castle gates in a rain of boiling pitch from the battlements, fresh tricks to outsmart the enemy. And whereas this much violence with modern weapons would be unbearable, with medieval arms it becomes heroic and exhilarating. There is something appealing about Mel Gibson -- the ruggedly masculine countenance, the quick half-smile, the knack of conveying blue-eyed hurt (as when he discovers the Bruce under an enemy helmet), and a squarer-jawed determination than Dick Tracy's -- that sustains Braveheart even through the unlikely scenes with Isabelle, the Princess of Wales (indifferently played by Sophie Marceau), and through the Wallace's -- or the Gibson's -- unconvincing displays of polyglotism. Add to this the beauties of Scotland, searchingly chronicled by John Toll's inexhaustible camera, the solid supporting performances among which Patrick McGoohan's sardonic-sadistic Edward I is especially noteworthy (never before have terminal consonants been drawn out to such ironic length), and the intelligently deployed music by James Horner. A Scottish acquaintance, George Campbell, questions the use of the sweeter uilleann (Irish) bagpipes rather than the fiercer Highland ones during the battle scenes, but these scenes are so exciting Horner could have used marimbas and I wouldn't have noticed. The film put me in mind of a four-line poem by Scotland's greatest modern poet, Hugh MacDiarmid: The rose of all the world is not for me. I want for my part Only the little white rose of Scotland that smells sharp and sweet -- And breaks the heart. And that is high praise.
4
What is there that can be said about Braveheart that hasn’t been said before? It’s an epic movie that ought to be in the conversation about the best films of the past thirty years. And actually, “epic” might be too small of a word. Braveheart is as much about the inner drama of William Wallace as it is about the life-and-death drama of the war for Scotland’s independence in the late 13th, early 14th centuries. It’s a story told on a grand scale with a great deal craft – and flair (and humor). This is a movie that offers both style and substance. It’s a direct precursor to the success of the Lord of the Rings movies – indeed, one can argue that the success of Braveheart set the stage for those films. True, Braveheart may not have universal appeal in terms of genre, story, or its brutal portrayal of war. But there can be little doubt of the value of a film that is, simply, one of the best I have ever seen.
The success of the film rests on the balance with which the story unfolds. Put simply, there’s something here for everyone: romance, action, character, philosophy, conflict, cinematography, great lines, music, and so on … and it all fits together almost flawlessly. I’m sure if you looked hard enough you could find fault with some parts of the movie, but considering its nearly three-hour run time it manages to avoid pitfalls remarkably well.
This is William Wallace’s story. And through him, the audience is allowed a mirror with which to view itself. This is the true measure of a great story: its ability to not only provide commentary, but also to provoke introspection. And that happens here quite often. One of the film’s most quoted lines is “Every man dies, not every man really lives.” Within just those seven words there is a great deal of thought and sentiment. It encapsulates a philosophy, a raison d’être, that anyone can immediately identify with. And it’s a beautiful philosophy – like carpe diem. And it encourages us to find the purpose and meaning within our lives on a daily basis.
This is also a love story, between William Wallace and Murron – a childhood friend. Theirs is a story that flows effortlessly from childhood tragedy and bonding, to adulthood romance and marriage. Indeed, it is Murron’s murder that proves to be Wallace’s motivation to launch his personal war against England whose king, Edward ‘the Longshanks’ is portrayed with a powerfully brutality in the film, making him a very compelling villain.
Wallace’s quest is joined by a cast that is quite adept in their roles. There are hardly any weak links in the acting of this movie, which means that the underlying themes and conflicts are portrayed to maximum effect from start to finish. Mel Gibson’s directing certainly has to be credited for some of that success.
This is, without question, Gibson’s film. And it’s not without a certain part of vanity from the lead actor and director. If you were looking for a critique, this would be the most fertile ground for it. But for the most part, whatever vanity Gibson may have been displaying is overshadowed by the craft of everything else. The action is riveting, the dialogue is crisp (and profound) and the music is deeply, deeply moving.
James Horner’s score successfully taps into the heritage of Scotland while displaying a full orchestral presentation. The instrumentation and arrangements are all very well done, from wavering flute to the bagpipes to the thunderous percussion during battle sequences.
5
I used to think that the history of Scotland around the end of the thirteenth century was one of those really complicated and messy affairs that could send any historian into a fit of sobbing. So imagine my surprise as I discovered it's really all about a bunch of rowdy guys mooning each other across a battlefield and then playing dodgeball.
"Braveheart" is one of those audacious films that implies that war is "bad" by putting the violence at the forefront, slowing it down and tossing in lots of extra blood, piercings, stabbings, castrations, amputations and assorted mutilations with random insertions of Mel's butt -- just to make sure that the women get into it too. This is all topped off by a really long and protracted moment where the camera lovingly dotes on Mel Gibson as he is taken to a platform to be tortured. It's the kind of moment that makes preschoolers point to the screen and say, "Christ figure! Christ figure!" Either that or: "Look! He's shamelessly grooming himself for the Oscars!" (Oscar committees love Christ figures.)
After three delirious hours the message is clear: Buy an ax, kill a lot of people, wear a kilt, show your butt, screw a princess and (if you have some time left over) repeat this over and over and over and over and over... until you get caught. If ever a movie cried out for a halftime break, this was it.
This has to be one of the best movies I have ever seen. I recently purchased it and have watched it at least five times since then, and each time I pick up on things I did not see the other times.I think that’s why it attract me so much. The fight scenes are great, the plot is both interesting and thought provoking, there is romance and comedy. This is a movie that any person can appreciate at some level.
True, the historical content may have been distorted, but even though, this movie is meant for entertainment. It is not a history lesson caught on video.
The acting is absolutely superb, this movie is guaranteed to have you on the edge of your seat for the entire three hours
Braveheart is as close to perfection as a movie can be. The acting is superb, the man who played Lonshanks, the actor who portrayed Robert the Bruce, both should have been nominated for Oscars due to their powerful rendering of evil and a man who is saved from losing his humanity (from becoming evil) by meeting William Wallace. And let us not forget the direction, the cinematography. Braveheart is glorious, beautiful to look at. The slow motion pictures of horses preparing to charge armed combatants, the entire landscape of Scotland that Mel Gibson captures with the camera. Braveheart is artwork, it is as good as any picture. That the film is number 93 on the list of the top 250 movies ever is a shame. Yes there is violence in this film but that violence does serve a point...that freedom isn't free and sometimes it takes death, gruesome and horrible, to let ones people taste what it is like to be free. Braveheart is a great movie and it deserves to at least be in the top ten of the greatest films.
这部电影我也很喜欢，有苏菲啊~~虽然年纪也不小了。另外瓦伦士也是该电影导演，自导自演获奥斯卡的极少。你再增加点内容就差不多了
《勇敢的心》观后感
Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule...
Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors...
Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps...
Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution...
Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil...
While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments...
Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best...
Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression...
前两天刚帮一个人写了一篇类似的文章，改动了一下再发。
《勇敢的心》
Brave Heart, the winner of Oscar Prize, is about the war between England and Scotland.
Based on the history, this movie reveals the reality of that age. People in Scotland had been ruled by English nobles for so long time. When the king of England wanted to improve the loyalty of his underlings and allowed them to rule Scotland in a crueler way, such as raping the bride in Scotland, people couldnt stand any more. They rised up to fight against England.
But in the movie, the most important thing is not fighting. It is the pursuit of freedom that attract me most. In the age mentioned in the movie, England ruled Scotland in a cruel way. People in Scotland rebelled.
Wallace, leader of the rebellion, was a real hero. He used to want to live an ordinary life, no fight, no blood and only love and peace aroun. But the fact was, his wife was killed by the rulers from England. He flied into a rage and decoted himself to the rebellion against his enemy. He fought bravely with his soldiers, for neither wealth nor power. What they want the most is that they could live a free life.
After long-time fighting, the rebellion was beaten down and Wallace was arrested. The ruler gave hime a last chance to confess and promised him if he did so, he might not be sentenced.
But what's Wallace's choice. At the last of his life, he abandoned the chance to survive and cried out, 'freedom'. This was the word that all people in Scotland wanted to say.
It is sarcastic that the English princess fell in love with Wallace and she got pregnant at the end of movie. She begged to her father in law, the king of England, to absolve Wallace but she was rejected. When the king was dying, she told him the truth that Wallace was the father of her baby who would become the king of England.
This movie is my favorite. It tells me that there is something named freedom which is more important than life.
William Wallace, a real hero who will be memorized.
华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士。他是一个让人尊敬的英雄。
首先是华莱士他的成长，对他而言，真正的成长是在失去了父亲以后。之前他只不过是一个单纯的小孩而已。当他看到那个小屋里被人吊死的同胞，他只是一种震吓，一般小孩一样惊吓而已。但他父亲哥哥死后，他变得勇敢，敢于直面死亡了，面对他父亲和哥哥的遗体，他变得如此平静。再后来，他叔叔把他带走，说是人要先学会用他的脑袋才能真正的战斗，把他带去接受教育，这个是他的故事的开端，也是他生命意义上的长大了。
其次是他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆。但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。
绛旓細remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in ...
绛旓細[鍕囨暍鐨勫績鑻辨枃瑙傚悗鎰焆Let us recall again the side to see the long process of history, how to create heroes, you will find from our own side, a life .There is a direct their shadow. First, the inheritance of childhood Wallace is not natural endowment from the hero, at best,...
绛旓細Finally William secretly marries the bonniest of lasses, Murron -- played by the breathtakingly beautiful and talented Catherine McCormack -- but the English get wind of it, and when she won't put out for them, slit her throat in a shattering scene irradiated by Miss McCormack's performanc...
绛旓細Every man in the world may go to fight,for peace,for freedom,or just for rage. These days I watched some excellent movies which received many awards in their times. Yesterday,I just finished watching Brave Heart.The excellent movie did gain tremendous achievements in those da...
绛旓細涓杈规槸鏂楀＋銆佽嫳闆勶紝涓杈规槸鎰氭槯鐨勫浗姘;涓杈规槸鍓嶈繘涓殑鍏堥攱锛屼竴杈规槸姝㈡涓嶅墠鐨勮惤浼嶈呫傚樊璺濆氨鍦ㄨ繖閲屼綋鐜颁簡锛屼唬娌熷湪杩欓噷浜х敓銆鍕囨暍鐨勫績鏄渿鎾间汉蹇冪殑锛屽洜涓鸿繖閲屾湁鍙吹鐨勬濇兂鈥斺旇嚜鐢便傛病鏈夎嚜鐢变簡浣犱滑杩樿兘骞蹭粈涔?涔熻鏄湡鐨勶紝鎴戜滑涔熻濂藉ソ鎬濋噺鎬濋噺銆傛湜閲囩撼锛亊~
绛旓細So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.It鈥檚 actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that...
绛旓細銆夿raveheart銆嬶紙鍕囨暍鐨勫績锛夛紙涓嬮潰鏄墽鎯呬粙缁嶏紝鎴戜笉鍐瑙傚悗鎰锛塈n the middle ages around thirteenth Century, King England" legs" Edward I ruled Scotland for Scotland, as he forced a group of Scotland people against the tyranny of the uprising, result of a young William Wallace lost his...
绛旓細鍕囨暍鐨勫績,鍕囨暍鍦版椿鐫銆 銆婂媷鏁㈢殑蹇冦瑙傚悗鎰 绡5 銆婂媷鏁㈢殑蹇冦嬩竴鐩磋瑙嗕负涓閮ㄦ偛澹殑銆佽瀺鍚堣娉紶濂囩殑鍙茶瘲鐗,鍦ㄥ奖鐗囦腑,浜轰滑甯稿父涓鸿嫃鏍煎叞閭ｇ坏寤剁殑灞辫剦銆佸噭濠夌殑椋庣瑳鍜岃嫃鏍煎叞浜烘皯鍦ㄨ传鍥扮棝鑻︿腑鍙戝嚭鐨勫噭鍘夊懠鍙锋墍鎰熷姩,涔熶负鍗庤幈澹竴寰鏃犲墠鐨勭簿绁炴墍榧撹垶銆傚▉寤?鍗庤幈澹殑绮剧灏卞鍚屼竴闈㈡棗甯,鎸囧紩鐫鑻忔牸鍏颁汉姘戜簤鍙栧埌浜嗘渶鍚庣殑鑷敱...
绛旓細銆鍕囨暍鐨勫績銆瑙傚悗鎰1 鍘嗗彶鍍忔繁澶滈噷娴╃氭棤闄呯殑澶╃┖涓鏍,閭ｆ牱绾磥銆佺編涓,浣夸汉鍏呮弧鏃犻檺鐨勯亹鎬,浣犵湅閭ｇ偣鐐圭殑绻佹槦,瑁呴グ鐫閭ｆ繁钃濊壊鐨勫箷甯,涓闂竴闂殑,鍏呮弧鐫鐢熷懡鐨勬椿鍔涖傜埍鎴戠湅鏉,浜虹被鍑犲崈骞寸殑鍘嗗彶灏卞儚閭ｆ旦鐎氱殑钃濆ぉ,鑰岄偅鍏呮弧娲诲姏鐨勭箒鏄,涓闂竴闂殑,瀹冧滑灏辨槸鍘嗗彶闀挎渤涓棤鏁扮殑鑻遍泟,浠栦滑閭ｉ珮娲佺殑鍝佹牸,宕囬珮鐨勪汉鏍奸瓍鍔,浼...
绛旓細鍕囨暍鐨勫績瑙傚悗鎰1 閮潠瀹囧婕,鏉ㄥ織鍒氱瓑涓绘紨鐨勫勾浠ｄ紶濂囧ぇ鎴忋婂媷鏁㈢殑蹇冦嬫鍦ㄥ寳浜佸ぉ娲ャ佹睙鑻忋佸北涓滃洓鍗鐑挱,璇ュ墽闆嗗鏃忔仼鎬ㄣ佸府娲炬枟浜夈佹姉鏃ユ垬浜夌瓑绮惧僵鏁呬簨鍐呭,璁茶堪涔变笘鑻遍泟鈥滅偧蹇冣濇垚闀垮彶銆 鏉ㄥ織鍒氬湪鐢佃鍓с婂媷鏁㈢殑蹇冦嬩腑濉戦犵殑闇嶅暩鏋楄繖涓鑹,鏇村鏄椂鍔块犺嫳闆,浠栨竻妤氳嚜宸卞彲浠ュ仛浠涔,鍏跺潥寮哄拰鍕囨暍鐨勮繘鍙栫簿绁,渚犺倽涔...
