用英语讲《加菲猫》电影的感受~ 用英语介绍一部英语电影？好看的。 加菲猫也行
\u52a0\u83f2\u732b\u82f1\u6587\u89c2\u540e\u611fAll the years I've been a loyal reader of the Garfield comics, I never had the impression it's merely meant for kids. On the contrary, most of the dry humor and charismatic Garfield poses are difficult to 'get' for young children. And yet, the film completely aims for a youthful audience. I have no problem with a movie being pro-children, but this is exaggerated and hardly accessible for adult viewers. The movie totally lacks all the elements that make the comics so entertaining. Garfield's clever and sarcastic remarks, Jon's clumsy womanizing techniques\u2026 All this has been replaced with an unhealthy dose of feel-good messages and lame jokes. The computer engineered Garfield doesn't appeal and the other, real pets are badly chosen. The plot is standard-sentiment, with Garfield saving his new housemate puppy from a sneaky, fame-chasing TV host. Breckin Meyer (as Jon Arbuckle) and Jennifer Love Hewitt (as the yummy vet Liz) walk around without anything to do and Bill Murray voices Garfield like it's some sort of dire job he wants to get rid of asap. The first (long-awaited?) cinema adventure of everybody's favorite cat appears to be a quickly produced and unprofessional flick soon to be forgotten. Too bad, since you're left behind with the feeling they could have done something better with this.
\u2026'The Terminal' is the latest Hanks/Spielberg collaboration, and though it's not quite as good as 'Catch Me if You Can' or 'Saving Private Ryan' it still makes for a fun watch. The plot, as everyone already knows, is about Krakozhian (sp?) immigrant Victor Narvorski (Tom Hanks) whose home country \u2013 the fictional land of Krakozhia (think Russia or Czechoslovakia) \u2013 is torn apart in war while he is in a plane headed for New York. When he lands JFK airport head Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci) tells him that since he literally doesn't have a country he must stay in the airport terminal until all the hoopla settles. Dixon thinks that Narvorski will ignore him, escape into New York and 'become someone else's problem'. What Dixon doesn't know is that Victor is an honest man, and he will obey the rules and stay in the terminal until he's allowed to leave.
The character of Victor Narvorski is one of those classic movie characters who has no conceivable flaw (other than a minimal understanding of the world around him \u2013 and an accent) and dose everything he can to help everyone else. Similar characters that spring to mind are Peter Sellers' Chauncey Gardner from the 1979 satire 'Being There' and John Goodman's Charlie Meadows from the Coen movie 'Barton Fink'. All of these characters are dim-witted, but great people who put their own lives on hold to help their friends.
Some of these friends include Airport worker Enrique Cruz (Diego Luna), who Victor helps get hitched with a beautiful security guard (Zo? Saldana) and Amelia Warren (Catherine Zeta-Jones) a nice, flighty flight attendant who Narvorski inspires to get out of a troubled relationship with a married man.
The Hanks and Zeta-Jones characters strike up a little romance, but luckily its not too overblown, it's more of a subplot than anything.
It takes sometime but soon Narvorski is accepted into a small group of Airport workers including Cruz, kindly Joe Mulroy (Chi McBride) and janitor Gupta Raja (Kumar Pallana), who at first thinks that Narvorski is a federal agent out to get him. These characters are all well written and even better acted, but I thought they could've been awarded with a little more screen time. After all, the three are very good actors. But I guess Luna is still riding off the success of 'Y U Mama Tambien' and McBride, despite the fact that he's been working for many years, is still trying to find a big role that's right for him (which I doubt he'll get from 'I, Robot').
It's Pallana who has the biggest role here, and man, does he deserve it. Very old, and very foreign, he was brought to surprising cult fame when Wes Anderson gave him the role of 'Pagoda' in the 2001 hit 'The Royal Tenenbaums'. Who doesn't remember the short, quiet, hilarious butler of the Tenenbaum family? His role in this is a great follow-up; he is funny, and surprisingly touching and dramatic in a very tense scene near the end that I wont spoil. In any other movie the role of the Indian janitor would be an easy target, but this character isn't funny because he's Indian, but instead funny because he's clever, a little cynical and wily. He stole every scene he's in from under Tom Hanks, or Zeta-Jones, or whoever. This is a long shot, but I think the man deserves an Oscar nomination.
The acting in this movie is the greatest factor \u2013 well, that and the huge Terminal set built only for the movie. Some critics are complaining about an underwritten and underused Catherine Zeta-Jones. Whatever. I call her under-necessary (Note: not UNnecessary, UNDER-necessary). I'm glad that her less-than-interesting character wasn't overused, I'm glad the movie wasn't turned into a straight-out romance.
The films deepest and most interesting character is Tucci's Dixon. On the surface he looks like your usual villain, but that's only to simpleton viewers who don't make any attempt to understand their movie characters. Dixon is not a villain. As it's established in the beginning, Dixon has been working the same job at the airport for seventeen years and wants desperately to climb up the latter. Because of this, he makes sure that he follows every single rule; he's the epitome of every by-the-book bureaucrat that we all love to hate. His motto is that in his work there're three important things, 'The person, the document and the story'. In the best scene of the movie Dixon refuses a Russian man to bring medicine to his dying father in Canada because he doesn't have the right form. This scene represents everything about the character of Dixon.
I was also interested in the relationship between Dixon and Narvorski. Dixon is at first refusing Narvorski because it's the rules, but as the film goes on and Dixon is further perplexed by Narvorski it stops being about rules and starts being about hatred and jealousy for Narvorski's joyful existence. He refuses to let Narvorski go to New York when he should be allowed to. In the film's most fulfilling scene Narvorski escapes and Dixon decides to give up chasing him, and you can see in his eyes that he's realized how ridiculous and stubborn he's been acting. This is Tucci's best performance. An Oscar for him, I say!
It is flawed, of course, in a few things. Narvorski's character is never developed, he stays the same person throughout the entire film, but that's fine, because Hanks keeps your interest and is at his most lovable. Also, the ending stretched on just a little bit\u2026if I had my way it would've ended with Dixon happily watching Narvorski escape in his cab, the rest could've just as easily been implied. I think the ending is a very important part of any film, and this one was \u2013 in a way \u2013 ruined.
But, no movie is perfect, and I have no problem accepting this as a lighthearted picture with a few interesting characters.
FUCK YOU
jhdgjdhvjkdsgfkjdgj,dhahjhn,mnkudhfhenryewikhjhjhjkhgjhusYDuiawyieakcbmxzlkjlihjiyukjjhhcmxbhkzgxydajgsdhasgdjhasdasdasdasd;lasjdjrkjsdfgll8ityueiojdflkgnm.dfrkjdhf.ncx,mnv,mcxnvljkcxhfuieysryuieh;kljklhgjhgjhgjhdgzfiewrkjn,kljkshfkjdshfdsbnv,mcxnv,m.xcvjkdfhgk;htgukhdkjhnk;l,j l;kljktfgnhuhjahdhaybneyhbayydjgjikuijerujmx.,mcjdkfjiserutulkjgkljklgjsdriturljtglkfdjgkljfdkgljfdklgjdlkfgj.,vmkc.iboutwyrjnb/gHN|";jlpfyohjsahdfkjasduqwhredm,ncilvjfkgnkfhsnd,maheuwaye,ndsf.kjdvjh,mnjdkfousdirjkfnmnmmsdnfasjknfdnmndfmnfjdhf,m'\s;qwoewutvjcnsa/;uiwethfcn.z<APFJMZX;ORCXMZL/UJCK/ZluSIUAGSDBCDSGLJIFDGYHNVJGHDUFHGJKDFHGFDUTYTHTDFMNGVDFHGJFDGDFGJDGHGDTDTSVXJHKLOLSAFQtyewfdaghzxzcgfjhaosklajfksdhjfhjhgjfyur6tkjbn,mn ,vjnh.
绛旓細鍔犺彶鐚1 浠庡墠锛屽姞鑿茬尗(姣斿皵"澧ㄧ憺閰嶉煶)鐨勭敓娲绘槸瀹岀編鐨勶紝瀹冨垢绂忓湴娌夋蹈鍦ㄨ嚜宸辨渶鍠滅埍鐨勪笁鏍蜂笢瑗夸箣涓細楂樼儹閲忛鐗┿侀暱鏃堕棿鏄忕潯鍜屼富浜锛屼箶鎭"闃垮竷搴(Jon Arbuckle锛孧eyer鎵紨)鏃犻檺鐨勫疇鐖憋紝鍙槸闃垮竷搴撳垰鍒氶鍏荤殑灏忕嫍濂ヨ开(Odie)鎶婅繖涓鍒囧叏閮ㄧ牬鍧忎簡锛岀幇鍦ㄥ畠浠涓鍚屽垎浜鐗╁拰瀹犵埍锛岃屾洿杩囧垎鐨勬槸锛岃繖鍙簿鍔涙椇鐩涚殑...
绛旓細鍦銆婂姞鑿茬尗銆嬬殑褰辩墖涓紝鍔犺彶鐚粠灏忓埌澶х殑鐢熸椿閮芥矇娴稿湪鈥曗曢珮鐑噺鐨勯鐗╋紝鐫¤锛屾崏寮勬剼锠㈢殑鐙楃嫍鍜屼富浜轰箶鎭•闃垮崪鐨勫疇鐖变腑锛屽姞鑿茶寰楄繖灏辨槸瀹岀編鐨勭敓娲汇傜洿鍒版湁涓澶╋紝涔旀仼甯﹀姞鑿插幓瀹犵墿鍖婚櫌鏃讹紝鍙楃編濂冲吔鍖绘墍鎵橀鍏讳簡灏忕嫍娆у紵锛屽姞鑿茬殑鐢熸椿褰诲簳鏀瑰彉銆傛寮熺殑鍒版潵鎰忓懗鐫瑕佸拰鍔犺彶鍒嗕韩椋熺墿鍜岄樋鍗滅殑瀹犵埍锛屾洿璁...
绛旓細ORCXMZL/UJCK/ZluSIUAGSDBCDSGLJIFDGYHNVJGHDUFHGJKDFHGFDUTYTHTDFMNGVDFHGJFDGDFGJDGHGDTDTSVXJHKLOLSAFQtyewfdaghzxzcgfjhaosklajfksdhjfhjhgjfyur6tkjbn,mn ,vjnh.
绛旓細鏈鍚庯紝鎴戜滑琚婇潚灞辩繝璋枫嬬殑鑷劧椋庡厜鎵鍚稿紩锛岃屻婂嚭姘磋姍钃夈嬪垯濡傝瘲濡傜敾銆涓鏇查毦蹇橈紝鏄數褰辨棆寰嬪甫鏉ョ殑鎰熷姩锛涚浉瑙佹仺鏅氾紝鏄數褰辨晠浜嬮噷鐨勭紭鍒銆傘婃亱鐖卞亣鏈熴嬪拰銆婂皬涓婃牎銆嬪垯鏄敓娲讳腑鐨勭敎铚滀笌鎸戞垬锛岃屻婂姞鑿茬尗銆嬪拰銆婂彉褰㈤噾鍒氥嬪垯甯︽潵鏃犲敖鐨勫ū涔愪笌鎯宠薄銆
绛旓細鏁撮儴褰辩墖鏃㈡悶绗戝張娓╅Θ锛岃浜虹湅鐨勮繃绋嬩腑涓嶇鍙戠瑧锛屾兂瑕佹嫢鏈夎繖鏍蜂竴鍙彲鐖辩殑鍔犺彶鐚傞殢鍚庣殑绗簩閮ㄤ腑锛屽姞鑿茬尗鍙互璇存槸鍙堜竴娆℃垚涓轰簡鐚敓璧㈠銆傚湪绗簩閮ㄤ腑锛屼粬琚璁や负鍏锋湁鑻卞浗鐨囧琛缁熺殑璐垫棌鐚紝缁ф壙浜嗕竴搴у崕涓界殑鍩庡牎銆傚湪鍩庡牎涓韩鍙椾簡浠嗕汉24灏忔椂鏃犲井涓嶈嚦鐨勬湇渚嶏紝鎷ユ湁鏈濂界殑缇庨锛屾渶鑸掗傜殑鍗у銆傝繃涓婁簡鏈...
绛旓細杩欓儴鐢靛奖鐨鏁呬簨鍙戠敓鍦ㄤ鸡鏁︼紝璁茶堪浜鍔犺彶鐚鍜岃吹鏃忕尗鐜嬪瓙鍦ㄩ槾宸槼閿欎箣涓嬩簰鎹㈣韩浠界殑鏁呬簨銆備富浜轰箶鎭╄拷闅忚嚜宸辩殑濂冲弸锛屽吔鍖昏帀涓濇潵鍒颁鸡鏁︼紝璁″垝鍦ㄩ偅閲屽疄琛屾眰濠氬ぇ璁★紝鑰屽姞鑿茬尗鍒欏甫鐫灏忕嫍濂ヨ拏婕傛磱杩囨捣锛屾墦绠楃粰涔旀仼涓涓儕鍠溿傚湪浼︽暒锛屽姞鑿茬尗閬囧埌浜嗕竴鍙叿鏈夌殗瀹よ缁熺殑鐚帇瀛愶紝骞舵剰澶栧湴涓庝粬浜掓崲浜嗚韩浠姐傜尗鐜嬪瓙鍒氬垰缁ф壙浜...
绛旓細鎬荤殑鏉ヨ鍔犺彶鐚殑鍙埍褰㈣薄涓鐩撮兘鍦紝鍔犺彶鐚拰鍙插姫姣旀槸澶у鐨勭骞村洖蹇嗐傚洜涓哄湪鐪嬪姩鐢荤墖鐨勬椂鍊欏睘瀹烇紝鎰熷彈鍒颁簡寰堝蹇箰鍔犺彶鐚竴鐩村湪闄即鐫澶у鎴愰暱銆傜浉淇鐢靛奖涓婃槧涔嬪悗浼氭湁寰堝绮変笣鍓嶅幓瑙傜湅鐨勶紝涓瀹氳兘澶熻鍔犺彶鐚殑鍙ｇ鍙樺緱瓒婃潵瓒婂ソ銆傛湁鐨勪汉瑙夊緱鍔犺彶鐚崄鍒嗛毦搴︼紝鍏跺疄鍔犺彶鐚槸鎯呮繁鎰忛噸鐨勩
绛旓細銆婂姞鑿茬尗2銆嬩互鎯熷鎯熻倴鐨勫姩鐢昏璁°佺簿褰╃殑璇█璁╀汉寰楀埌缇庡鐨勮鍚韩鍙楋紝涓骞曞箷鎼炵瑧鐨勫満闈粛鍘嗗巻鍦ㄧ洰銆傛垜鍠滄鍔犺彶鐚殑鍙埍鍜岀埍鑰嶅皬鑱槑锛屾洿鍠滄浠栫殑鑻遍泟琛ㄧ幇鍜屽洟缁撳崗浣滅殑绮剧銆傘愭墿灞曢槄璇荤瘒銆戣鍚庢劅锛屽氨鏄湅浜嗕竴閮褰辩墖鎴栬繛缁墽鍚庯紝鎶婂叿浣鎰熷彈鍜屽緱鍒扮殑鍚ず鍐欐垚鐨勬枃绔犮傛墍璋撯滄劅鈥濓紝鍙互鏄粠浣滃搧涓鎮...
绛旓細鍔犺彶鐚嬭鍚庢劅 8鏈11鏃 鏄熸湡浜 鏅 浠婂ぉ锛屾垜鍜屽濡堟潵鍒颁簡鍗庡涵褰遍櫌鍏磋嚧鍕冨媰鍦扮湅浜嗕竴鍦烘縺鍔ㄤ汉蹇冪殑銆佹儕蹇冨姩榄勭殑銆婂姞鑿茬尗銆嬬數褰銆傚奖鐗囦腑锛屽ぇ鍚嶉紟榧庣殑鑲ヤ粩鍔犺彶鐚拰瀹冪殑濂界嫍鍙嬫杩紝鍏磋嚧鍕冨媰鍦伴殢涓讳汉涔旀仼绂诲紑缇庡浗鐨勮佸锛屽幓鑻卞浗鏃呰銆傝屽畠鐨勭敺涓讳汉涔旀仼娆¤鐨勭洰鐨勬槸鎯充互姹傚鐨勬柟寮忕粰濂冲弸鑾変笣涓涓儕鍠...
绛旓細濮撳悕锛鍔犺彶鐚 鑻辨枃锛欸ARFIELD鍑虹敓鏃ユ湡锛1978骞6鏈19鏃ュ嚭鐢熷湴鐐癸細濡堝鏌斿鐨勫帹鎴 鍑虹敓鏃朵綋閲嶏細5纾6瀹夊＋锛(鑷充粖杩樻槸鏈閲嶇殑绾綍) 鐜版椂浣撻噸锛氭牴鎹粬鐨勬瘮渚嬶紝浠栫殑閲嶉噺鐩稿綋浜庝竴鑹樿埅绌烘瘝鑸般 鐗瑰緛锛14鍙寚澶淬6鏍硅儭椤诲拰1涓矇绾㈣壊鐨勯蓟瀛 鍠滅埍鐨勮繍鍔細鐫¤鏈鍠滄鐨勪汉锛氳嚜宸 鏈涓嶈兘蹇嶈愮殑鍘嬪姏锛氶ゥ楗挎渶濂界殑鏈嬪弸...
